Denarius Rome

This is for the history buffs.?

If my concept is correct that Jesus was actually Augustus Caesar a certain point of evidence would emerge as a possibility. Check this out.
The denarius coin of ancient Rome had a portrait of Augustus on it. Jesus/Octavian said; whose picture is on the coin. His answer was Caesar. Note:Both Julius and Octavian were called Augustus. Under my idea the portrait would be of Julius.
Now comes the good part. Revelation say at chapter 13 that the beast had an image. The Jews called Caesar a beast.
I take “image” to mean “look-alike”. The face on the coin should match the image on the Shroud of Turin. BINGO. GOOGLEGOOGLEGOOGLE.

My head hurts.
Julius was not “Augustus”
“Caesar” was a name adopted by many emperors.
Every reference to a “beast” should not be taken to mean the same being. That’s just rediculous. In Genesis, Adam named the beasts. Are we saying that Roman Emperors were hanging out in the Garden of Eden?
Shroud of Turin is a well known fake. It dates hundreds of years after the death of Jesus.
Why you’re insisting “image” means look-alike” I have no idea…other than its the only way to make your sentence make sense.

Please stop just making things up. This isn’t the first time you’ve posted this nonsense.

The Denarius